Comparison of GOMS Analysis Methods

11Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although members of the same family of techniques, the Keystroke Level Model and CPM-GOMS often predict different execution times for the same task [4]. Our data suggest that KLM describes error-tree performance of a skilled user with little practice on a particular task whereas CPM-GOMS describes error-free performance after extensive practice. A participant completed a task 500 times using two different methods. Observed times for the first error-free trial were close to the times predicted by KLM and quickly decreased with practice to more closely match those predicted by CPM-GOMS. The biggest contributor to the change were mental operators, which decreased markedly in both duration and frequency, although the duration of pointing also decreased.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baskin, J. D., & John, B. E. (1998). Comparison of GOMS Analysis Methods. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 261–262). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/286498.286742

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free