Role of wearable rhythm recordings in clinical decision making—The wEHRAbles project

47Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Multiple wearable devices for rhythm analysis have been developed using either photoplethysmography (PPG) or handheld ECG. Hypothesis: The aim of this survey was to assess impact of these technologies on physicians' clinical decision-making regarding initiation of diagnostic steps, drug therapy, and invasive strategies. Methods: The online survey included 10 questions on types of devices, advantages, and disadvantages of wearable devices as well as case scenarios for patients with supraventricular arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation (AF). Results: A total of 417 physicians (median age 37 [IQR 32-43] years) from 42 countries world-wide completed the survey. When presented a tracing of a regular tachycardia by a symptomatic patient, most participants would trigger further diagnostic steps (90% for single-lead ECG vs 83% for PPG, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manninger, M., Kosiuk, J., Zweiker, D., Njeim, M., Antolic, B., Kircanski, B., … Duncker, D. (2020). Role of wearable rhythm recordings in clinical decision making—The wEHRAbles project. Clinical Cardiology, 43(9), 1032–1039. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23404

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free