Adherence to calcium channel blocker therapy in older adults: A comparison of amlodipine and felodipine

3Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The efficacy of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers for treating hypertension appears to be similar, but a variety of factors, including patient characteristics, tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties, may influence treatment adherence and outcome. We aimed to evaluate treatment adherence in clinical practice among older hypertensive adults (50+ years) prescribed amlodipine or felodipine for the first time as part of the California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) program. We used a retrospective, matched, cohort-analysis design. Over 1 year, patients prescribed amlodipine were 12% less likely to discontinue study treatment than those prescribed felodipine. Discontinuation tended to occur early, with 20% and 30% of amlodipine and felodipine patients, respectively, discontinuing treatment after one prescription. A non-significant difference in favour of amlodipine was demonstrated for anti-anginal medication use among patients taking these drugs at baseline. This study suggest that use of amlodipine may be associated with improved adherence, compared with felodipine, among older out-patients in the Medi-Cal program. Copyright © 2004 Cambridge Medical Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menzin, J., Lang, K., Elliott, W. J., Boulanger, L., Arocho, R., Tran, M. H., & Friedman, M. (2004). Adherence to calcium channel blocker therapy in older adults: A comparison of amlodipine and felodipine. Journal of International Medical Research, 32(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323000403200301

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free