Multi-tagging for lexicalized-grammar parsing

33Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With performance above 97% accuracy for newspaper text, part of speech (POS) tagging might be considered a solved problem. Previous studies have shown that allowing the parser to resolve POS tag ambiguity does not improve performance. However, for grammar formalisms which use more fine-grained grammatical categories, for example TAG and CCG, tagging accuracy is much lower. In fact, for these formalisms, premature ambiguity resolution makes parsing infeasible. We describe a multi-tagging approach which maintains a suitable level of lexical category ambiguity for accurate and efficient CCG parsing. We extend this multitagging approach to the POS level to overcome errors introduced by automatically assigned POS tags. Although POS tagging accuracy seems high, maintaining some POS tag ambiguity in the language processing pipeline results in more accurate CCG supertagging. © 2006 Association for Computational Linguistics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Curran, J. R., Clark, S., & Vadas, D. (2006). Multi-tagging for lexicalized-grammar parsing. In COLING/ACL 2006 - 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 697–704). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1220175.1220263

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free