Quantiferon®-TB gold in-tube performance for diagnosing active tuberculosis in children and adults in a high burden setting

41Citations
Citations of this article
121Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To determine whether QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT) can contribute to the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB) in children in a high-burden setting and to assess the performance of QFT and tuberculin skin test (TST) in a prospective cohort of TB suspect children compared to adults with confirmed TB in Tanzania. Methods: Sensitivity and specificity of QFT and TST for diagnosing active TB as well as indeterminate QFT rates and IFN-γ levels were assessed in 211 TB suspect children in a Tanzanian district hospital and contrasted in 90 adults with confirmed pulmonary TB. Results: Sensitivity of QFT and TST in children with confirmed TB was 19% (5/27) and 6% (2/31) respectively. In adults sensitivity of QFT and TST was 84% (73/87) and 85% (63/74). The QFT indeterminate rate in children and adults was 27% and 3%. Median levels of IFN-γ were lower in children than adults, particularly children <2 years and HIV infected. An indeterminate result was associated with age <2 years but not malnutrition or HIV status. Overall childhood mortality was 19% and associated with an indeterminate QFT result at baseline. Conclusion: QFT and TST showed poor performance and a surprisingly low sensitivity in children. In contrast the performance in Tanzanian adults was good and comparable to performance in high-income countries. Indeterminate results in children were associated with young age and increased mortality. Neither test can be recommended for diagnosing active TB in children with immature or impaired immunity in a high-burden setting. © 2012 Rose et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rose, M. V., Kimaro, G., Nissen, T. N., Kroidl, I., Hoelscher, M., Bygbjerg, I. C., … Ravn, P. (2012). Quantiferon®-TB gold in-tube performance for diagnosing active tuberculosis in children and adults in a high burden setting. PLoS ONE, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037851

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free