A ROSE BY ANY OTHER NAME? STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS IN ISRAEL

  • Siman-Tov D
  • Fridman O
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The term strategic communications is missing from the Israeli academic and professional discourse. Instead, there are three different conceptual approaches to state communication in Israel—hasbara, public diplomacy, and cognitive campaign. Analysing the history of the development and employment of these three concepts, this article makes two contributions important for the field of strategic communications. First, it analyses how Israel has found itself with various approaches; why it does not have one comprehensive framework; and whether any of the three approaches can be considered the equivalent of ‘Israeli strategic communications’. Second, based on the case of Israel, it establishes the need for states to have an exhaustive conceptual framework to conduct strategic communications and the consequences of the absence of such a framework.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siman-Tov, D., & Fridman, O. (2020). A ROSE BY ANY OTHER NAME? STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS IN ISRAEL. Defence Strategic Communications, (8), 17–51. https://doi.org/10.30966/2018.riga.8.1.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free