Learning from patients' written feedback: medical students' experiences

7Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Methods: Fifty-nine medical students evaluated their learning experience of receiving patients' written feedback obtained from the PFCP questionnaire. Students (N = 57) evaluated their experiences by applying a nine-question evaluation survey (Likert scale N = 3 and free-text questions N = 6) and/or participated in a semi-structured interview (N = 6 students). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. Results: The analysis of data from the students' evaluation survey was performed using 4-point Likert scale questions presented in mean, SD and range; ability to apply patient-centred communication (3.3, 0.74, 2-4), guidance for further clinical training of clinical skills (3.2, 1.31, 1-4) and visualization of the pedagogical assignment during an encounter (3.0, 1.68, 1-4). A content analysis of the free-text questions from the students' evaluation surveys and interviews resulted in three themes: (1) confidence in clinical practice, (2) application of patient-centred communication and (3) identification of learning needs. Conclusions: The results indicate that patients' feedback facilitated a reflective self-directed learning process with the identification of learning needs and increased awareness of the patient as a collaborative partner during the encounter. Patients' written feedback adjacent to a patient encounter is identified as a valuable additional learning tool in medical students' workplace learning. Further studies are required to explore how patients' written feedback can be operationalized in different clinical contexts, for example, in in-patient care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Björklund, K., Stenfors, T., Nilsson, G., & Leanderson, C. (2022). Learning from patients’ written feedback: medical students’ experiences. International Journal of Medical Education, 13, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.61d5.8706

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free