Differentially conserved amino acid positions may reflect differences in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV behaviour

6Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Motivation: SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus currently causing a pandemic. Here, we performed a combined insilico and cell culture comparison of SARS-CoV-2 and the closely related SARS-CoV. Results: Many amino acid positions are differentially conserved between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, which reflects the discrepancies in virus behaviour, i.e. more effective human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and higher mortality associated with SARS-CoV. Variations in the S protein (mediates virus entry) were associated with differences in its interaction with ACE2 (cellular S receptor) and sensitivity to TMPRSS2 (enables virus entry via S cleavage) inhibition. Anti-ACE2 antibodies more strongly inhibited SARS-CoV than SARS-CoV-2 infection, probably due to a stronger SARS-CoV-2 S-ACE2 affinity relative to SARS-CoV S. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV displayed differences in cell tropism. Cellular ACE2 and TMPRSS2 levels did not indicate susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. In conclusion, we identified genomic variation between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV that may reflect the differences in their clinical and biological behaviour. VC The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bojkova, D., McGreig, J. E., McLaughlin, K. M., Masterson, S. G., Antczak, M., Widera, M., … Cinatl, J. (2021). Differentially conserved amino acid positions may reflect differences in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV behaviour. Bioinformatics, 37(16), 2282–2288. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free