Erratum to: Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care (Nature Communications, (2018), 9, 1, (5217), 10.1038/s41467-018-07619-7)

Lena Maier-Hein; Matthias Eisenmann; Annika Reinke; Sinan Onogur; Marko Stankovic; Patrick Scholz; Tal Arbel; Hrvoje Bogunovic; Andrew P. Bradley; Aaron Carass; Carolin Feldmann; Alejandro F. Frangi; Peter M. Full; Bram van Ginneken; Allan Hanbury; Katrin Honauer; Michal Kozubek; Bennett A. Landman; Keno März; Oskar Maier; Klaus Maier-Hein; Bjoern H. Menze; Henning Müller; Peter F. Neher; Wiro Niessen; Nasir Rajpoot; Gregory C. Sharp; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Stefanie Speidel; Christian Stock; Danail Stoyanov; Abdel Aziz Taha; Fons van der Sommen; Ching Wei Wang; Marc André Weber; Guoyan Zheng; Pierre Jannin; Annette Kopp-Schneider

ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Erratum to: Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care (Nature Communications, (2018), 9, 1, (5217), 10.1038/s41467-018-07619-7)

Nature Communications

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08563-w

7Citations

26Readers

Abstract

In the original version of this Article the values in the rightmost column of Table 1 were inadvertently shifted relative to the other columns. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maier-Hein, L., Eisenmann, M., Reinke, A., Onogur, S., Stankovic, M., Scholz, P., … Kopp-Schneider, A. (2019, December 1). Erratum to: Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care (Nature Communications, (2018), 9, 1, (5217), 10.1038/s41467-018-07619-7). Nature Communications . Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08563-w

Erratum to: Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care (Nature Communications, (2018), 9, 1, (5217), 10.1038/s41467-018-07619-7)

Abstract

Cite

Register to see more suggestions