Abstract
The current note refers to the comparison between a NACA 2510 airfoil with adiabatic walls and the same airfoil with heated patches. Both suction and pressure sides were divided into two regions covering the leading edge (L.E.) and trailing edge (T.E.). A RANS method sensitivity test has been performed in the preliminary stage while for the extended 3D cases a DES-SST approach was used. Results indicate that surface temperature distribution influences the aerodynamics of the airfoil, in particular the viscous drag component but also the lift of the airfoil. Moreover, the influence depends not only on the surface temperature but also on the positioning of the heated surfaces, particularly in the case of pressure lift and drag. Further work will be needed to optimize the temperature distribution for airfoil with higher camber.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Valeriu, D. (2016). Influences of surface temperature on a low camber airfoil aerodynamic performances. INCAS BULLETIN, 8(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2016.8.1.6
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.