perspective: Musings on the Acropolis: Terminology for biogeography

  • Scheiner S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Biogeography, like all science, is better served when its vocabulary usage is precise, organized and simple. In this light, I examine three intertwined sets of concepts concerning scale and diversity. First, I show how ‘scale’ consists of four components: sampling unit, grain, focus and extent. Using those more precise terms prevents potential ambiguities in communication. I also clear up a confusion in the usage of ‘focus’ that I promulgated in an earlier paper. Second, I explain how organizing our concepts concerning species richness relationships both disambiguates those concepts and leads to the develop‐ ment of new theories. Third, I explore the multitudinous ideas and terms that have collected under the general concept of ‘diversity’ and propose one scheme for simplifying current confusions. Biogeography is in a period of unification of its disparate threads of ecology, phylogeography and phylogenetics. In weaving together concepts of scale and diversity, I hope that this essay contributes to that unification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scheiner, S. M. (2012). perspective: Musings on the Acropolis: Terminology for biogeography. Frontiers of Biogeography, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.21425/f5fbg12409

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free