Examining the “July effect” on patients undergoing pituitary surgery

8Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Our aim in this study was to assess the impact of the turnover of residents in July on patients undergoing pituitary surgery. Methods: This work was a retrospective cohort study of cases from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Patients who underwent pituitary surgery from 2005 to 2012 were selected in the NIS. Patients undergoing surgery in July and in non-July months were compared to determine differences in demographics, comorbidities, and complications. Results: Of the 12,939 patients, 1098 (8.5%) underwent pituitary surgery in July. Patients receiving surgery in July had similar demographics and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality comorbidity values compared with patients receiving surgery in other months. There were no significant differences in mortality, cerebral edema, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, iatrogenic pituitary complications, iatrogenic cerebrovascular accidents, urinary tract infections, pulmonary edema, pulmonary complications, or acute cardiac complications. There were no differences in the rate of postoperative fistulas, hematomas, perforations, or infections. The use of meningeal suturing, pedicled or free-flap reconstruction, and skin reconstruction was more frequent in July. Finally, hospitalization costs in July were similar to costs in other months. Conclusion: The turnover of new residents in July showed no change in complication rates for patients undergoing pituitary surgery. Patient care in July is similar to care during other months, demonstrating that hospitals are adequately supervising surgical residents during this transition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bashjawish, B., Patel, S., Kılıç, S., Hsueh, W. D., Liu, J. K., Baredes, S., & Eloy, J. A. (2018). Examining the “July effect” on patients undergoing pituitary surgery. International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology, 8(10), 1157–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22164

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free