A Comparison of Ten Different Methods for the Analysis of Saturates, Olefins, Benzene, Total Aromatics, and Oxygenates in Finished Gasolines

9Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Technical Committee 19 of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN/TC19) in the "Lisbon resolution" requested to evaluate replacement methods to the fluorescent indicator absorption (FIA) (American Standardization for Testing and Material D 1319) method for the determination of aromatics and olefins in gasolines. In the same resolution it was requested to review the two existing methods for the determination of benzene content of gasolines, anticipating lower limit values in future European gasoline specifications. As a result of this request, a round robin (RR) was organized in which 8 gasoline samples are analyzed using 10 different methods in 33 laboratories. The methods used in the RR include, apart from the FIA method, one-dimensional gas chromatography (GC) and multidimensional GC, with and without specific detectors and spectroscopic analysis methods. This study describes these methods in short, gives an evaluation of the results of the RR, and draws a conclusion on the outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beens, J., Feuerhelm, H. T., Fröhling, J. C., Watt, J., & Schaatsbergen, G. (2003). A Comparison of Ten Different Methods for the Analysis of Saturates, Olefins, Benzene, Total Aromatics, and Oxygenates in Finished Gasolines. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 41(10), 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/41.10.564

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free