Abstract
There is a clash between some people's positive logical intuitions about traditional or Aristotelian logic and the assessment ofthat logic made by modem logic. In response to the clash, four sorts of reasons that might be given for referring one logic to the other are considered, but it is argued that none of them provides a decisive reason in favor of one rather than the other. A reformist and a radical response to the apparent inability to give reasons to prefer one logic to the other are considered and reasons given for preferring the radical response.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bohl, J. P. (2001). What Should We Do With Traditional Logic? Informal Logic, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v22i1.2572
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.