Testing for variants in CYP2C19: Population frequencies and testing experience in a clinical laboratory

69Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

PurposeWe sought to determine the genotype frequencies for cytochrome p450 enzyme 2C19 variant alleles both in the US pan-ethnic population and various US ethnic groups and to establish the frequency of clinically actionable genotypes.MethodsAnalytical results were obtained from 1,396 consecutive samples submitted for cytochrome p450 enzyme 2C19 genotyping tests and stored in a proprietary database. This database was queried and genotypes and predicted phenotypes established. Anonymized samples were obtained from specimens submitted for cystic fibrosis genotyping that contained ethnicity information. Samples from 357, 149, and 346 individuals self-identified as white, African American, and Hispanic, respectively, were analyzed. In addition, 342 anonymized samples submitted for Ashkenazi Jewish panel testing were analyzed. ResultsSignificant ethnic differences were observed in the frequencies of the *17 ultrarapid allele among the various groups studied. In the pan-ethnic population, 3.8% of tested patients were classified as ultrarapid metabolizers, 24% as extensive metabolizers heterozygous for a *17 ultrarapid allele, 27% as intermediate metabolizers, and 3.5% as poor metabolizers. Using stringent criteria, 7.3% of individuals would have clinically actionable genotypes. In addition, we detected two individuals with a haplotype of *2/*17 and a single individual with a haplotype of *4/*17 indicating that the *17 hypermetabolic allele can occur on a *1, *2, or *4 background. © 2012 American College of Medical Genetics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strom, C. M., Goos, D., Crossley, B., Zhang, K., Buller-Burkle, A., Jarvis, M., … Sun, W. (2012). Testing for variants in CYP2C19: Population frequencies and testing experience in a clinical laboratory. Genetics in Medicine, 14(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.0b013e3182329870

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free