Abstract
Microring YT was evaluated and compared with established methods for the identification of 142 clinical yeast isolates. Only 75 isolates (52.8%) were correctly identified by Microring YT. Results with this test were often difficult to read and subject to interlaboratory variations.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Shankland, G. S., Hopwood, V., Forster, R. A., Evans, E. G. V., Richardson, M. D., & Warnock, D. W. (1990). Multicenter evaluation of Microring YT, a new method of yeast identification. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 28(12), 2808–2810. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.28.12.2808-2810.1990
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free