"Volksgemeinschaft". Potenzial und grenzen eines neuen forschungskonzepts

34Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This essay indicates three differing ways in which Volksgemeinschaft is currently used: to denote changed power relations; as a mobilising force through 'affective integration'; and as a vehicle of exclusion, discrimination and persecution. It acknowledges in each area some value in the concept. But it sees nevertheless a major problem in trying to turn a propaganda slogan into a tool of historical explanation. It points to the difficulty in demonstrating consensus in a terroristic dictatorship, to the continued existence of subcultures that challenged the unity of a Volksgemeinschaft, and to surviving pluralistic attitudes even towards the treatment of Jews. It suggests that a binary divide between inclusion and exclusion might be too simplistic a model. The essay concludes that the Volksgemeinschaft concept has prompted some valuable research but that it has major defects as a genuine tool of analysis. Copyright © 2009 Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kershaw, I. (2011, January). “Volksgemeinschaft”. Potenzial und grenzen eines neuen forschungskonzepts. Vierteljahrshefte Fur Zeitgeschichte. https://doi.org/10.1524/vfzg.2011.0001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free