Recursive Annotation for Negative Labeling in Data-Driven Mineral Prospectivity Mapping

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Data engineering is a challenge in mineral prospectivity mapping using supervised data-driven methods because of a general paucity of true samples, both positive and negative. Naïve random sampling of unlabeled samples as presumptive negative samples is a common method, but it creates label crossover, which is the condition that otherwise true positives would be reversed in class designation. For mineral prospectivity mapping, label crossover has two main effects: (1) it artificially decreases the area of positive prospectivity because label crossover is asymmetrical; and (2) it increases model variance by increasing model complexity and, therefore, weakens the spatial continuity of predictions. These effects reduce the realism and trustworthiness of spatial analytic products (e.g., maps), which hinders their adoption. Here, we propose a data-driven and recursive annotation method based on positive and unlabeled learning to annotate negative samples. Our method progressively biases the negative labeling of unlabeled samples using prospectivity scores (as a class prior). The optimization of the number of recursions occurs through a joint maximization of the variable (aspatial) and spatial domain objectives of prospectivity mapping. Reducing label crossover improves the performance of a deep ensemble (of unique workflows) and increases spatial continuity of the resulting prospectivity map. Only two iterations of annotation were necessary for the refinement of a graphite prospectivity map in Canada. By its design, recursive annotation is broadly compatible with a range of workflows.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, S. E., Coutts, D., Parsa, M., Cumani, R., & Thompson, A. (2025). Recursive Annotation for Negative Labeling in Data-Driven Mineral Prospectivity Mapping. Natural Resources Research, 34(5), 2373–2402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-025-10510-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free