Insulin Pump Settings during Breastfeeding in Women with Type 1 Diabetes

16Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We aimed to explore insulin pump settings in breastfeeding women with type 1 diabetes. Methods: Thirteen unselected breastfeeding women with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy were included consecutively from April 2016 to October 2017. Blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 6 days was applied at 1, 2, and 6 months after delivery. Recommendations were intake of 210 g carbohydrate daily while aiming for glucose target range 4.0-10.0 mmol/L and avoiding hypoglycemia. Immediately after delivery a reduction of total insulin dose by 30% of the prepregnancy dose was recommended. Insulin pump target glucose was 5.8 mmol/L. Results: Median diabetes duration was 22 (range 13-36) years. At 1, 2, and 6 months, 13, 11, and 8 women, respectively, were breastfeeding and spent ≥70.8% (25%-99%) of time in the glucose target range and ≤3.8% (0%-15.5%) of time with CGM <4.0 mmol/L at night-time and for 24 h. None of the women experienced severe hypoglycemia. HbA1c was 58 (47-72) mmol/mol and 52 (44-60) at 6 months and prepregnancy, respectively, P = 0.18. At 1, 2, and 6 months, the insulin pump settings remained almost stable with basal insulin rates (at 03.00, 08.00, 12.00, and 18.00) 14% lower and the carbohydrate-to-insulin ratios 10% higher than the prepregnancy settings. Conclusions: In breastfeeding women with type 1 diabetes who consumed sufficient amounts of carbohydrates and obtained appropriate glycemic control, the basal insulin rates were 14% lower and carbohydrate-to-insulin ratios 10% higher than before pregnancy. These data are useful when recommending insulin pump settings after delivery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nørgaard, S. K., Nørgaard, K., Roskjær, A. B., Mathiesen, E. R., & Ringholm, L. (2020). Insulin Pump Settings during Breastfeeding in Women with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics, 22(4), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0280

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free