Aesthetics of Graffiti: Comparison to Text-Based and Pictorial Artforms

9Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Graffiti art is a controversial art form, and as such there has been little empirical work assessing its aesthetic value. A recent study examined image statistical properties of text-based artwork and revealed that images of text contain less global structure relative to fine detail compared to artworks. However, previous research did not include graffiti tags or murals, which reside in the space between text and visual art. The current study investigated the image statistical properties and attractiveness of graffiti relative to other text-based and pictorial art forms, focusing additionally on the role of expertise. A series of images (N = 140; graffiti, text and paintings) were presented to a group of observers with varying degrees of art interest and expertise (N = 169). Findings revealed that image statistics predicted attractiveness ratings to images, and that biases against graffiti art are less salient in an expert sample.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chamberlain, R., Mullin, C., Berio, D., Leymarie, F. F., & Wagemans, J. (2022). Aesthetics of Graffiti: Comparison to Text-Based and Pictorial Artforms. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 40(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237420951415

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free