Journal ArticleOPEN ACCESS

More on anonymous reviews

  • Armstrong A
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union (2004) 85(16) 160-160
DOI: 10.1029/2004eo160009
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Reading the ongoing correspondence in Eos , I would propose that the difficulty lies in the dual nature of the reviewing process. The first stage asks, is the work worth publishing? The second asks, is the paper as submitted worthy of the work done? The dilemma is that the requirements for anonymity are different for the two functions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Armstrong, A. (2004). More on anonymous reviews. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 85(16), 160–160. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004eo160009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free