Curing depth of different shades of a photo-activated prosthetic composite material

34Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study determined the depth of cure of different shades of a prosthetic composite material with the aim of evaluating the influence of shade variation on post-curing material properties. Four light shades having small tabs (A1, B1, C1 and D2) and four dark shades having higher tabs (A4, B4, C4 and D4) of a prosthetic composite (Artglass) for body paste based on the Vita Lumin Shade guide were selected. Specimens of each shade were exposed with the proprietary photo-curing unit (UniXS) for periods 20, 30, 60 and 90 s. The curing depth of the material for each shade was determined with a scraping technique described by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 4049), and average values of groups of five specimens were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Scheffe's S intervals (P < 0.05). The L*a*b* colour parameters of five specimens after 90 s exposure were measured using a small-area dental colorimeter (ShadeEye) in order to determine the colorimetric differences. Three-factor ANOVA revealed that the depth of cure was influenced by shade letter (A, B, C or D) and shade tab (1 and 2, or 4) as well as by the exposure period (P = 0.05). Curing depth of the light shades was consistently greater than that of the dark shades. Among the eight shades selected, B1 shade demonstrated the greatest curing depth, while A4 shade exhibited the lowest curing depth. For all shades, longer exposure increased the depth of cure. All of the light shades exhibited higher L* values than any of the four dark shades. Curing depth of the composite material was found to be related to the Vita shade variation and the exposure period. © 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tanoue, N., Koishi, Y., Matsumura, H., & Atsuta, M. (2001). Curing depth of different shades of a photo-activated prosthetic composite material. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 28(7), 618–623. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00697.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free