Comparison of Hand Antiseptic Effects and Costs of 0.5 w/v% Chlorhexidine Gluconate/Ethanol Lotion and 4 w/v% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Scrub

1Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Preoperative hand washing is normally based on scrubbing with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, but the Guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) nows recommends waterless methods using quick-drying antiseptics. Therefore, hand antiseptic effects and costs were compared between a 0.5 w/v% chlorhexidine gluconate/ethanol lotion preparation and 4 w/v% chlorhexidine gluconate by the glove juice method in 22 nurses. No significant difference was observed in antiseptic effects between the two agents immediately and 3 hours after hand washing, but the ethanol-based preparation was more cost effective. © 2008, Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shiraishi, T., Kawai, Y., Fuse, A., & Outani, K. (2008). Comparison of Hand Antiseptic Effects and Costs of 0.5 w/v% Chlorhexidine Gluconate/Ethanol Lotion and 4 w/v% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Scrub. Japanese Journal of Environmental Infections, 23(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.4058/jsei.23.124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free