UNCERTAINTY IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF EQUATION OF STATE MODELS

  • Weirs V
  • Fabian N
  • Potter K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

See, stats, and : https : / / www . researchgate . net / publication / 266524527 Uncertainty Equation Article DOI : 10 . 1615 / Int . J . UncertaintyQuantification . 2012003960 CITATIONS 0 READS 21 5 , including : V . Gregory Sandia 22 SEE Nathan Sandia 17 SEE Kristin University 32 SEE All . The . All - text and , letting . ABSTRACT In this paper we present the results from a series of focus groups on the visualization of uncertainty in Equation - Of - State (EOS) mod - els . The initial goal was to identify the most effective ways to present EOS uncertainty to analysts , code developers , and mate - rial modelers . Four prototype visualizations were developed to pre - sented EOS surfaces in a three - dimensional , thermodynamic space . Focus group participants , primarily from Sandia National Labora - tories , evaluated particular features of the various techniques for different use cases and discussed their individual workflow pro - cesses , experiences with other visualization tools , and the impact of uncertainty to their work . Related to our prototypes , we found the 3D presentations to be helpful for seeing a large amount of in - formation at once and for a big - picture view ; however , participants also desired relatively simple , two - dimensional graphics for better quantitative understanding , and because these plots are part of the existing visual language for material models . In addition to feed - back on the prototypes , several themes and issues emerged that are as compelling as the original goal and will eventually serve as a starting point for further development of visualization and analysis tools . In particular , a distributed workflow centered around material models was identified . Material model stakeholders contribute and extract information at different points in this workflow depending on their role , but encounter various institutional and technical bar - riers which restrict the flow of information . An effective software tool for this community must be cognizant of this workflow and al - leviate the bottlenecks and barriers within it . Uncertainty in EOS models is defined and interpreted differently at the various stages of the workflow . In this context , uncertainty propagation is difficult to reduce to the mathematical problem of estimating the uncertainty of an output from uncertain inputs .

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weirs, V. G., Fabian, N., Potter, K., McNamara, L., & Otahal, T. (2013). UNCERTAINTY IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF EQUATION OF STATE MODELS. International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 3(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2012003960

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free