Comments on "convectively generated potential vorticity in rainbands and formation of the secondary eyewall in hurricane rita of 2005"

9Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In a previous paper Judt and Chen propose that secondary eyewall formation can be the result of the accumulation of convectively generated potential vorticity in the rainbands. They argue that secondary potential vorticity maxima precede the development of the secondary wind maximum and conclude that vortex Rossby waves do not contribute to the formation of the secondary eyewall. Amidst examination of their thought-provoking study, some questions arose regarding their methodology, interpretation, and portrayal of previous literature. Here the authors inquire about aspects of the methodology for diagnosing vortex Rossby waves and assessing their impact on their simulation. Inaccuracies in the literature review are noted and further analysis of existing, three-dimensional, full-physics, numerical hurricane integrations that exhibit canonical secondary eyewalls are encouraged. © 2013 American Meteorological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Terwey, W., Abarca, S. F., & Montgomery, M. T. (2013). Comments on “convectively generated potential vorticity in rainbands and formation of the secondary eyewall in hurricane rita of 2005.” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-030.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free