A comparative analysis of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR methods for prioritization of the risk criteria of an autonomous vehicle system

15Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the current study, two widely used multi­criteria decision­making methods, the Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the Fuzzy VIKOR method, have been implemented to prioritize the criteria of a multi­criteria decision­making problem. Herein, the case study is an autonomous vehicle, the TalTech iseAuto AV shuttle, developed at TalTech University. The criteria of the present problem are evaluated by experts, and after forming the pairwise matrices, these matrices are aggregated by the max­min method with the arithmetic mean. Subsequently, in the case of Fuzzy AHP, by calculating the weights and normalizing them, the relative importance of each criterion is obtained, which leads to the ranking of the criteria. Moreover, in the case of the Fuzzy VIKOR method, the aggregated pairwise matrix is weighted and normalized. The ranking obtained from both methods is presented and compared. The advantages and disadvantages of the multi­criteria decision­making methods Fuzzy AHP and VIKOR, featured for risk analysis of the autonomous vehicle systems, are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mehrparvar, M., Majak, J., & Karjust, K. (2024). A comparative analysis of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR methods for prioritization of the risk criteria of an autonomous vehicle system. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, 73(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2024.2.04

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free