Ranibizumab for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: A meta-analysis of dose effects and comparison with no anti-VEGF treatment

17Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) 0.5 mg or 0.3 mg with non-anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and to compare the efficacy of IVR 0.5 mg with IVR 0.3 mg in the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. Methods: Relevant studies were selected after an extensive search using the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Outcomes of interest included visual outcomes, anatomic variables, and adverse events. Results: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met our inclusion criteria. IVR 0.5 mg produced a significantly higher improvement in visual acuity at six months, with pooled weighted mean differences (WMDs) of 12.30 early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) letters (95% CI:10.03, 14.58) (P∈

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Song, W. T., & Xia, X. B. (2015). Ranibizumab for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: A meta-analysis of dose effects and comparison with no anti-VEGF treatment. BMC Ophthalmology, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0017-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free