Considerations for developing predictive spatial models of crime and new methods for measuring their accuracy

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A literature review of the important trends in predictive crime modeling and the existing measures of accuracy was undertaken. It highlighted the need for a robust, comprehensive and independent evaluation and the need to include complementary measures for a more complete assessment. We develop a new measure called the penalized predictive accuracy index (PPAI), propose the use of the expected utility function to combine multiple measures and the use of the average logarithmic score, which measures accuracy differently than existing measures. The measures are illustrated using hypothetical examples. We illustrate how PPAI could identify the best model for a given problem, as well as how the expected utility measure can be used to combine different measures in a way that is the most appropriate for the problem at hand. It is important to develop measures that empower the practitioner with the ability to input the choices and preferences that are most appropriate for the problem at hand and to combine multiple measures. The measures proposed here go some way towards providing this ability. Further development along these lines is needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joshi, C., Curtis-Ham, S., D’ath, C., & Searle, D. (2021). Considerations for developing predictive spatial models of crime and new methods for measuring their accuracy. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10090597

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free