Examining the Perceptions Among Undergraduate Nursing Students Using Virtual Reality in a Community Course: A Mixed-Methods Explanatory Study

11Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of integrating virtual reality (VR) technology into a community nursing course, specifically home and environmental patient safety assessments. Design: This study used a mixed-methods approach with an explanatory design. Methods: Participants were recruited from a community health course. The students engaged in a VR simulation involving home visits using the vizHome platform. Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the System Usability Scale (SUS). Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Quantitative data were collected through Qualtrics and secure Zoom connections for the interviews. The data were analyzed with SPSS and MAXQDA. Findings: The results indicated that participants perceived VR as valuable and easy to use for learning home assessment skills. The System Usability Scale (SUS) score revealed room for improvement. Technical limitations were identified as challenges that must be addressed to enhance the user experience. Conclusion: Participants acknowledged VR’s potential to supplement traditional learning methods, providing safe and realistic exposure to diverse home environments. While VR was seen as beneficial, it was not considered a replacement for actual home visits in community nursing education. Clinical evidence: This study provided clinical teaching evidence on the usability and student perceptions of VR in community courses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fontenot, J., Hebert, M., Lin, H. C., & Kulshreshth, A. K. (2024). Examining the Perceptions Among Undergraduate Nursing Students Using Virtual Reality in a Community Course: A Mixed-Methods Explanatory Study. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 41(3), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370016.2023.2280617

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free