War and Cultural Property: The 1954 Hague Convention and the Status of U.S. Ratification

11Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In May of 1954, the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (Hague Convention) was adopted in an attempt to curb the destruction of movable and immovable cultural property during war. Recent conflicts, such as the continuing war in the Balkans, remind us that the Hague Convention is as relevant today as it was fifty years ago. Although this Convention is the most comprehensive and internationally recognized treaty to protect cultural property in time of war, the United States remains one of the few signatories that has yet to ratify it. In January 1999, former President William J. Clinton forwarded the Hague Convention to the Senate with the recommendation that it ratify the Convention and part of Protocol I. Although this presented perhaps the first real opportunity in nearly half a century for the United States to join one hundred countries and ratify the Hague Convention, its fate remains uncertain. Generally oriented towards the United States' policy and practice, this article broadly discusses the Hague Convention, its history, its weaknesses and strengths, and the current status of U.S. ratification. © 2001, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Colwell–Chanthaphonh, C., & Piper, J. (2001). War and Cultural Property: The 1954 Hague Convention and the Status of U.S. Ratification. International Journal of Cultural Property, 10(2), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739101771317

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free