Correspondence and coherence in science: A brief historical perspective

9Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper introduces historical aspects of the concepts correspondence and coherence with emphasis on the nineteenth century when key aspects of modern science were emerging. It is not intended to be a definitive history of the concepts of correspondence and coherence as they have been used across the centuries in the field of inquiry that we now call science. Rather it is a brief history that highlights the apparent origins of the concepts and provides a discussion of how these concepts contributed to two important science related controversies. The first relates to aspects of evolution in which correspondence and coherence, as competing theories of truth, played a central role. The controversy about evolution continues into the beginning of the twenty-first century in forms that are recognizably similar to those of the middle of the nineteenth century. The second controversy relates to the etiology of blood-born infections (sepsis) during childbirth (childbed fever). In addition to correspondence and coherence, the authors introduce other theories of truth and discuss an evolutionarily cogent theory of truth, the pragmatic theory of truth.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dawson, N. V., & Gregory, F. (2009). Correspondence and coherence in science: A brief historical perspective. In Judgment and Decision Making (Vol. 4, pp. 126–133). Society for Judgment and Decision making. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500002552

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free