Smartphones: Parts of Our Minds? Or Parasites?

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Smartphones are often assumed to be obvious examples of cognitive extension. We offer reasons to reject this assessment, arguing that modern smartphones (and the apps installed on them) are not cognitive extensions after all. Modern smartphones are designed to manipulate the attention and behaviour of users in ways that further the interests of the corporations that built them. In this they are importantly different from resources typically associated with the extended mind—such as notebooks, Scrabble racks and maps—which are not designed to manipulate or exploit users (even if they can be corrupted to these ends in some cases). It is not plausible for a part of the cognitive system to be designed to thwart the goals and desires of the user in the way a smartphone is. Given this, we argue, modern smartphones are better understood as external to, but symbiotic with, our minds, and, sometimes even parasitic on us, rather than as cognitive extensions. Thinking about them in this way better reflects the true nature of our relationship with them, and the ways that the relationship can both benefit and harm us.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, R. L., & Brooks, R. C. (2026). Smartphones: Parts of Our Minds? Or Parasites? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 104(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2025.2504070

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free