Prognosis of segmentectomy and lobectomy for radiologically aggressive small-sized lung cancer

22Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the radiological characteristics of aggressive small-sized lung cancer and to compare the outcomes between segmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with these lung cancers. METHODS: A series of 1046 patients with clinical stage IA1-IA2 lung cancer who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy at 3 institutions was retrospectively evaluated to identify radiologically aggressive small-sized (solid tumour size _ 0.8) or highly metabolic (maximum standardized uptake >_ 2.5) tumour. Among patients with radiologically aggressive lung cancer, no significant statistical differences in 5-year recurrence-free (81% vs 90%; P = 0.33) and overall (88% vs 93%; P = 0.76) survival comparing lobectomy (n = 392) to segmentectomy (n = 130) were observed. Among 115 propensity-matched pairs, 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival were similar between patients who underwent lobectomy and those who underwent segmentectomy (83.3% and 88.3% vs 90.9% and 94.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Difference in survival was not identified with segmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with radiologically aggressive small-sized lung cancer with high risk of recurrence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kamigaichi, A., Tsutani, Y., Mimae, T., Miyata, Y., Ito, H., Nakayama, H., … Okada, M. (2020). Prognosis of segmentectomy and lobectomy for radiologically aggressive small-sized lung cancer. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 58(6), 1245–1253. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaa231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free