Landmark-enhanced heuristics for goal recognition in incomplete domain models

13Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recent approaches to goal recognition have progressively relaxed the assumptions about the amount and correctness of domain knowledge and available observations, yielding accurate and efficient algorithms. These approaches, however, assume completeness and correctness of the domain theory against which their algorithms match observations: this is too strong for most real-world domains. In this paper, we develop goal recognition techniques that are capable of recognizing goals using incomplete domain theories by considering different notions of planning landmarks in such domains. We evaluate the resulting techniques empirically in a large dataset of incomplete domains, and perform an ablation study to understand their effect on recognition performance.

References Powered by Scopus

Strips: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving

2936Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The FF planning system: Fast plan generation through heuristic search

1442Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fast planning through planning graph analysis

1036Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Survey on Goal Recognition as Planning

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discovering underlying plans based on shallow models

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What's the Context? Implicit and Explicit Assumptions in Model-Based Goal Recognition

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pereira, R. F., Pereira, A. G., & Meneguzzi, F. (2019). Landmark-enhanced heuristics for goal recognition in incomplete domain models. In Proceedings International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS (pp. 329–337). AAAI press. https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v29i1.3495

Readers over time

‘19‘21‘22‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0