Abstract
The elbow, which is the upper limb's intermediate joint, is prone to pathological occurrences and stiffness in particular. As a patient's ability to perform compensatory motions deteriorates, intolerance develops. Individuals frequently suffer from fractures and dislocations. Prior to treatment, a thorough examination is required. Physical therapy is crucial in the recovery of function. The purpose of this research is to examine the benefits of regular stretching vs. PIR in the muscle energy technique on postoperative elbow stiffness, discomfort, and range of motion. A Randomized Control Trial will be used to conduct the research. A total of 20 participants will be chosen from AVBRH and RNPC OPD, Sawangi (Meghe), based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twenty subjects will be divided into two groups, with one group receiving Stretching (static stretching) and other receiving Muscle Energy Technique (Post isometric relaxation). The patient's outcome measurements will be the Visual Analogue Scale for Pain and the Universal Goniometer Range of Motion Assessment. When compared to stretching, this study found that employing muscular energy approach can be more beneficial. It may aid in to the recovery of muscular strength, as well as the patient's ability to conduct compensatory movements in nearby joints. The majority of studies found Muscle energy approach to be more helpful in expanding range of motion, but only a few studies found stretching to be effective.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Shende, G., Deshmukh, M. P., & Phansopkar, P. (2022). Efficacy of passive stretching vs muscle energy technique in Postoperative Elbow stiffness. Journal of Medical Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences, 11(4), 5012–5016. https://doi.org/10.55522/jmpas.V11I4.1262
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.