Technology: Is There Sufficient Evidence to Change Practice in Point-of-Care Management of Coagulopathy?

11Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Currently, hemostasis is one of the most widely researched topics in perioperative medicine. As investigators learn more about the complexity of coagulation, developing tests with the ability to rapidly monitor coagulation and guide targeted therapy is the key to optimizing hemostasis management. There is mounting evidence that algorithmic transfusion using point-of-care (POC) testing can reduce red cell and platelet transfusions and major bleeding after cardiac surgery. Integrating these tests during cardiac surgery and trauma management is especially important because these groups use the most blood products within a health system and the risks of transfusion are well documented. Currently, numerous POC tests are available for evaluating hemostasis. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current evidence surrounding the most common POC testing devices in practice for managing coagulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fabbro, M., Winkler, A. M., & Levy, J. H. (2017, October 1). Technology: Is There Sufficient Evidence to Change Practice in Point-of-Care Management of Coagulopathy? Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. W.B. Saunders. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2017.05.037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free