MONEY VERSUS PAIN: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF A CONFLICT IN HUMANS

  • Cabanac M
31Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ten healthy human males volunteered to be subjects in an experiment in which they were to be paid to endure a painful sensation. This sensation was produced by isometric muscular contraction in the thighs. For each of six sessions the subjects received either a payment that was changed for each session (0.2, 0.5, 1.25, 3.125, 7.8125 French francs per 20 s) or a lump sum. At the beginning of a session, the subjects assumed a seated position against a wall, but without a seat, and the duration for which they could hold this position was the chief variable measured. Heart rate, blood pressure, and magnitude estimation of pain were also recorded periodically throughout each session. Pain was reported after a mean delay of 15 ± 7 s ( SE ), and the magnitude estimates then increased linearly with time. The duration of maintaining the painful position increased linearly in relation to the logarithm of the increase in the amount of payment. Thus, utility of money decreased when pitted against pain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cabanac, M. (1986). MONEY VERSUS PAIN: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF A CONFLICT IN HUMANS. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1986.46-37

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free