Oestrogen receptor analysis: Correlation between enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemical methods

47Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: To compare oestrogen receptor measurements on fresh tissue done by an enzyme immunoassay (ER-EIA, Abbott) and an immunohistochemical technique (ER-ICA, Abbott) using formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded material. Methods: The ER-EIA is based on a sandwich immunoassay using fresh frozen tissue, and the absorbence values were read by a Quantum Analyzer. Sections were cut from the corresponding paraffin wax blocks, and after pretreatment with pronase and DNase, the slides were incubated with monoclonal oestrogen antibody. The immunoperoxidase staining was scored semiquantitatively, incorporating both the intensity and ercentage of positive stainign (HSCORE). Results: HSCORE rating of the ER-ICA slides gave a significant correlation with the quantitative ER-EIA values (r = 0.76; p < 0.001). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the immunohistochemical method was 88% and 93%, respectively. Conclusions: ER-ICA on routinely processed material can be a valuable alternative when biochemical analysis of oestrogen receptor content is not available. Furthermore, immunohistochemical staining identifies oestrogen receptor positivity at a cellular level, which ensures that the analysed material is representative. This technqiue could therefore be particularly valuable in small tumours and in situ lesions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aasmundstad, T. A., Haugen, O. A., Johannesen, E., Hoe, A. L., & Kvinnsland, S. (1992). Oestrogen receptor analysis: Correlation between enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemical methods. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 45(2), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.45.2.125

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free