Is there a difference in phenotype between males and females with non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia? A cross-sectional evaluation

8Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia includes a variety of phenotypes and genotypes that rarely require regular transfusions. However, these patients can experience a wide range of complications. The objective of this retrospective study was to verify whether there is a significant difference in non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia-related complications and treatment among males and females. Methods: We performed a re-analysis of samples evaluated in a previously published cross-sectional study, regarding 96 non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients followed at the ‘UOSD Malattie Rare del Globulo Rosso’ Centre of the Cardarelli Hospital in Naples, Italy. Results: We found that females were more anemic than males, but there was no significant difference in prevalence of common complications among genders, except for hypogonadism. Furthermore, the transitory regular transfusions regimen in women who had been pregnant does not seem to have a significant impact on overall prognosis. Discussion: In non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients, the lower levels of hemoglobin found in females do not seem to indicate a higher prevalence of complications. Conclusion: This data should be considered in studies with experimental treatments aiming to correct anemia in patients with non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia. It should probably also be taken into account in order to set up different transfusion regimens among genders in transfusion-dependent patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marsella, M., Ammirabile, M., Di Matola, T., Pepe, A., Costantini, S., Filosa, A., & Ricchi, P. (2018). Is there a difference in phenotype between males and females with non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia? A cross-sectional evaluation. Hematology, 23(8), 522–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/10245332.2017.1413789

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free