Is the taxable income elasticity sufficient to calculate deadweight loss? The implications of evasion and avoidance

200Citations
Citations of this article
202Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Martin Feldstein's 119992 widely used taxable income formula for deadweight loss assumes the marginal social cost of evasion and avoidance equals the tax rate. This condition is likely to be violated in practice for two reasons. First, some of the costs of evasion and avoidance are transfers to other agents. Second, some individuals overestimate the costs of evasion and avoidance. In such situations, excess burden depends on a weighted average of the taxable income and total earned income elasticities, with the weight determined by the resource cost of sheltering income from taxation. This generalized formula implies the efficiency cost of taxing high income individuals is not necessarily large despite evidence that their reported incomes are highly sensitive to marginal tax rates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chetty, R. (2009). Is the taxable income elasticity sufficient to calculate deadweight loss? The implications of evasion and avoidance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(2), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.1.2.31

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free