Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia)

59Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a two-dimensional drawing, when the narrow edge of a bar appears to touch the edge of a large rectangle, humans overestimate the length of the bar (Kanizsa, 1979). Kanizsa has suggested that this illusion occurs because humans perceive the bar as continuing behind the rectangle and complete the "occluded" portion of the bar. Rhesus monkeys and pigeons were trained to classify black target bars with a variety of lengths as "long" or "short." In training, the bar was always located at the same distance from a gray box. After learning this discrimination, the subjects were tested on novel stimuli, in which the bar was located at three new locations. Monkeys showed a consistent response bias for "long" when the bar touched the box, but pigeons did not. Monkeys appear to have completed the "occluded" part like humans, whereas pigeons failed to do so. Because this procedure does not require animals to complete the "occluded" part with any particular form, their failure suggests that pigeons do not even perceive the target bar as continuing behind the "occluding" figure. The failure of pigeons may be due to difficulty in perceiving depth from two-dimensional drawings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fujita, K. (2001). Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia). Perception and Psychophysics, 63(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200507

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free