Analysis of Meat Juice Leakage from Refrigerated Culinary Pork, Beef, and Chicken Meat into the Unit Packaging: Estimation of Reference Limits for Distribution and Retail in Poland

Abstract

Featured Application: The results obtained in this study were used to estimate the levels of meat juice leakage in fresh, chilled culinary meat subjected to vacuum packaging and modified atmosphere packaging, which can then serve as reference values for all participants in the distribution chain to assess the quality of fresh culinary meat during distribution and at retail stages. The work significantly contributes to enhancing the quality standards of fresh meat and boosting consumer confidence in vacuum-packaged and modified atmosphere meat products. Meat juice leakage is a natural phenomenon, evident in culinary meat packaging, and is a key indicator of meat quality. This study aimed to evaluate the amount of meat juice leakage into the packaging during culinary pork, beef, and chicken storage in a refrigerated display case simulating retail conditions (2–4 °C, 12 days). The study included 1800 high-quality culinary meat samples, i.e., free of technological defects, packaged in vacuum (VAC) and modified atmosphere (MAP), with and without absorbent pads, obtained from meat processing plants. On the 12th day of storage, the leakage was determined in the meat portions using the gravimetric method, and pH and color (CIEL*a*b*) were measured using instrumental methods. It was found that the leakage level from culinary meat ranged from 2.10% for pork shoulder VAC to 10.70% for pork loin VAC, in slices, being influenced (p < 0.01) by each grouping factor: meat type, meat cut, and package type. Regardless of the packaging method, culinary chicken meat had a lower pH (p < 0.001) than pork and beef. The study also found significant negative correlations between pH and leakage in most culinary meat cuts, as shown by the results for ham VAC (r = −0.66), ham MAP (r = −0.59), and heel of round MAP (r = −0.50). Among meat color parameters, the most significant variability was observed for lightness (L*), whose mean value differed significantly depending on the type of meat (p < 0.001) and the meat cut (p < 0.001), and within the same culinary cut—except beef tenderloin and chicken breast fillet–also depending on the type of packaging (p < 0.05). Based on the results obtained in this study, covering a large number of culinary meat samples, it was suggested that recommended leakage levels, i.e., those that raise no concerns regarding meat quality, could range from 2% for shoulder and pork neck (both VAC) to just over 10% for tenderloin slices (packaged using the MAP and VAC methods). Our findings can be used by both meat producers and quality control authorities to monitor the quality of culinary meat, e.g., they may help determine maximum permissible leakage levels and design meat packaging methods to reduce leakage. Ultimately, these measures will enhance consumer confidence in meat production and quality. Additionally, the results systematize knowledge on meat leakage, providing valuable insights for scientists who support producers and retailers in their efforts to minimize this issue.