Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Training and Service Delivery: An International Survey

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: Highlighting the global disparities in otolaryngology training and, ultimately, service delivery, emphasizing the need for equitable access to training resources and programs. Objective: To describe the relationship between the quality, content, and location of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery training and education and the resulting impact on the delivery of otolaryngology care globally. Design: An online cross-sectional survey to otolaryngologists, gathering information on their training and education experiences, and factors influencing their choice of training location and practice. Setting: The online survey was available in multiple languages, distributed via national and international professional otolaryngology societies, snowballing and social media. Participants: The respondents were practicing otolaryngologists representing all seven World Health Organization regions. Exposures: World Bank income groups classification. Main Outcomes and Measures: Our expected outcome was that subspecialty training and access to educational resources were significantly readily available to respondents from high-income countries, leading to more confidence in performing complex procedures post training. Results: A total of 91 participants were included in the analysis, with 47 (52%) practicing in high-income countries and 44 (48%) in low- and middle-income countries. Sixty-one participants (67%) were male. Subspecialty training and access to educational resources were significantly less available in low- and middle-income countries, leading to lower confidence among low- and middle-income countries physicians in performing complex procedures. High-income country respondents reported better access to diverse training resources and felt more prepared for a broader range of procedures. Conclusion and Relevance: Significant disparities exist in OHNS training resources and subspecialty training opportunities between high- and low-middle-income countries. There is a critical need to integrate complementary training and educational modalities into local systems. Addressing the shortage of educational resources and promoting open-access initiatives in low-middle-income countries are essential steps toward enhancing surgical education and improving global otolaryngology healthcare outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nuss, S., Nakku, D., Pandey, A., Elwell, Z., Fei-Zhang, D., Srinivasan, T., … Din, T. (2025). Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Training and Service Delivery: An International Survey. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70096

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free