Satisfaction survey with DNA cards method to collect genetic samples for pharmacogenetics studies

12Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Pharmacogenetic studies are essential in understanding the interindividual variability of drug responses: DNA sample collection for genotyping is a critical step in genetic studies. A method using dried blood samples from finger-puncture, collected on DNA-cards, has been described as an alternative to the usual venepuncture technique. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of the DNA cards method in a multicentre clinical trial, and to assess the degree of investigators' satisfaction and the acceptance of the patients perceived by the investigators. Methods: Blood samples were collected on DNA-cards. The quality and quantity of DNA recovered were analyzed. Investigators were questioned regarding their general interest, previous experience, safety issues, preferences and perceived patient satisfaction. Results: 151 patients' blood samples were collected. Genotyping of GST polymorphisms was achieved in all samples (100%). 28 investigators completed the survey. Investigators perceived patient satisfaction as very good (60.7%) or good (39.3%), without reluctance to finger puncture. Investigators preferred this method, which was considered safer and better than the usual methods. All investigators would recommend using it in future genetic studies. Conclusion: Within the clinical trial setting, the DNA-cards method was very well accepted by investigators and patients (in perception of investigators), and was preferred to conventional methods due to its ease of use and safety. © 2006 Vidal-Taboada et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vidal-Taboada, J. M., Cucala, M., Herrero, S. M., Lafuente, A., & Cobos, A. (2006). Satisfaction survey with DNA cards method to collect genetic samples for pharmacogenetics studies. BMC Medical Genetics, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-7-45

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free