Enhancing Sustainability and Economics of Concrete Production through Silica Fume: A Systematic Review

20Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This review article addresses the problems associated with the carbon footprint of the cement industry. The PRISMA framework methodology was for data extraction from published studies. In-depth research has been done in the literature on using silica fume as a cement replacement in concrete production, considering environmental, engineering, and economic (EEE) factors. The strength, durability, and economic parameters results revealed a positive variation of up to 5–20% substitution of silica fume. However, most past studies reported the threshold at a 10% replacement ratio. A novel benefit-cost ratio analysis was also done in this review study. The benefit-cost ratio analysis reveals the economically beneficial effects that can be achieved in sustainable silica fume-based concrete with a (5–20%) silica fume combination. The benefit-cost ratio showed positive effects, up to 20% cement replacement with silica fume. Hence, the higher cement replacement with silica fume is also beneficial in terms of the benefit-cost ratio. Further research has been proposed based on the findings of this review study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alhajiri, A. M., & Akhtar, M. N. (2023, October 1). Enhancing Sustainability and Economics of Concrete Production through Silica Fume: A Systematic Review. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran). Salehan Institute of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-10-017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free