Randomised trial of continuous nasogastic, bolus nasogastric, and transpyloric feeding in infants of birth weight under 1400 g

39Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Forty three infants under 1400 g were fed by a bolus nasogastric, continuous nasogastric, or transpyloric route. There were more complications with transpyloric feeding and no identifiable benefits in the growth rate, oral energy input, or chosen biochemical indices of nutrition. Bolus or continuous nasogastric feeds rather than transpyloric are better routine methods in infants of low birth weight.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

MacDonald, P. D., Skeoch, C. H., Carse, H., Dryburgh, F., Alroomi, L. G., Galea, P., & Gettinby, G. (1992). Randomised trial of continuous nasogastic, bolus nasogastric, and transpyloric feeding in infants of birth weight under 1400 g. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 67(4 SPEC NO), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.67.4_Spec_No.429

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free