How many PET tracers do we need?

31Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The recognized need for new PET tracers is associated with increases in available PET instrumentation and with unmet clinical challenges in the early diagnosis and staging of diseases. The clinical success of 18F-FDG PET has resulted in the acceptance of biologic signals as part of disease management. The advantages of PET technology over SPECT will lead to the introduction of new PET tracers for established nuclear medicine imaging indications. Disease-specific markers such as amyloid ligands will lead to new applications of PET to neurodegenerative diseases that are prevalent in aging societies. The translation of molecular imaging to clinical applications will require combining specific tracer approaches with targeted therapy for the realization of personalized medicine. An important aspect of the introduction of new PET tracers will be the emergence of a specialized radiopharmaceutical industry and professional distribution networks. The number of available PET tracers not only will follow rules of demand and supply but also will be dependent on the regulatory environment of individual health care systems. Copyright © 2011 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schwaiger, M., & Wester, H. J. (2011, December 1). How many PET tracers do we need? Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.085738

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free