Registration in a quality register: A method to improve end-of-life care - A cross-sectional study

25Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Structured methods to assess and support improvement in the quality of end-of-life care are lacking and need to be developed. This need is particularly high outside the specialised palliative care. This study examines whether participation in a national quality register increased the quality of end-of-life care. Design: This study is a cross-sectional longitudinal register study. Setting: The Swedish Register of Palliative Care (SRPC) collects data about end-of-life care for deaths in all types of healthcare units all over Sweden. Data from all 503 healthcare units that had reported patients continuously to the register during a 3-year period were analysed. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Data on provided care during the last weeks of life were compared year-by-year with logistic regression. Participants: The study included a total 30 283 patients. The gender distribution was 54% women and 46% men. A total of 60% of patients in the study had a cancer diagnosis. Results: Provided end-of-life care improved in a number of ways. The prevalence of six examined symptoms decreased. The prescription of 'as needed'medications for pain, nausea, anxiety and death rattle increased. A higher proportion of patients died in their place of preference. The patient's next of kin was more often offered a follow-up appointment after the patient's death. No changes were seen with respect to providing information to the patient or next of kin. Conclusions: Participation in a national quality register covariates with quality improvements in end-of-life care over time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martinsson, L., Fürst, C. J., Lundström, S., Nathanaelsson, L., & Axelsson, B. (2012). Registration in a quality register: A method to improve end-of-life care - A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001328

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free