The intersectional case of poverty in discrimination law

37Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article I aim to identify the nature of poverty discrimination, its judicial treatment and possible redressal within the discourse of discrimination law. The article delineates a key 'intersectional' feature of poverty as one which intersects with (i) multiple disadvantages of redistribution (joblessness, homelessness, malnutrition, illiteracy), recognition (stereotypes, stigma, humiliation), participation (social and political exclusion) and transformation (structural domination); as well as (ii) multiple grounds and status-identities (like race, colour, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability, age and so on). This complex and cross-cutting intersectional nature of poverty can be recognised in discrimination law not only by reading in poverty as a ground, but also by opening up ways of thinking about poverty as central to our conceptual understanding of equality and nondiscrimination per se. Treating poverty as a matter of discriminatory context or as a matter of substantive equality are two such worthwhile strategies to take a cue from.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Atrey, S. (2018). The intersectional case of poverty in discrimination law. Human Rights Law Review, 18(3), 411–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngy021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free