Comparison of dynamic MRI vaginal anatomical changes after vaginal mesh surgery and laparoscopic sacropexy

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate anatomical differences in vaginal length and axis between transvaginal mesh surgery (TVM) and laparoscopic sacropexy (LSC) by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Twenty-seven women with stage II or more symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse were involved in this study. Thirteen patients had undergone TVM, and fourteen had LSC. Preoperative and at 1 year postoperative clinical examination and dynamic MRI were performed. The angle between the vaginal axis and horizontal line or pubococcygeal line and the position of the Douglas pouch were evaluated on MRI. In clinical examination, all compartments (Aa, Ba, C, Ap, Bp, D) were significantly improved after both surgeries. Point C and D tended to be higher after LSC than TVM. In MRI assessment, the position of the Douglas was positioned significantly higher after LSC than TVM. There was no difference in postoperative vaginal axis at rest between the two surgical techniques, but the vaginal axis with maximal strain after TVM was more horizontal than LSC (LSC 143.7 ± 6.3° vs. TVM 155.1 ± 12.3°, p = 0.003). As a result, the change of vaginal axis from at rest to maximal strain was also apparently greater after TVM. (LSC 10.3 ± 9.1° vs. TVM 20.7 ± 11.3°, p = 0.014). Both TVM and LSC significantly improved pelvic organ descent evaluated by clinical examination and MRI. LSC suspends the uterus, and Douglas pouch was significantly higher than TVM. The vaginal axis at rest leans horizontally after both surgeries, but the change of vaginal axis from at rest to maximal strain was significantly higher after TVM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kashihara, H., Emmanuelli, V., Poncelet, E., Rubod, C., Lucot, J. P., Pouseele, B., & Cosson, M. (2014). Comparison of dynamic MRI vaginal anatomical changes after vaginal mesh surgery and laparoscopic sacropexy. Gynecological Surgery, 11(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-014-0864-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free